Table of Contents
x
- Planning for Hazards: Land Use Solutions for Colorado
- Description
- Planning Framework
- Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
- Planning Tools and Strategies
- How Do I Apply Risk Assessment Results to Planning?
- Overview of Planning Tools and Strategies
- Addressing Hazards in Plans and Policies
- Strengthening Incentives
- Protecting Sensitive Areas
- Improving Site Development Standards
- Landscaping Ordinance
- Improving Buildings and Infrastructure
- Enhancing Administration and Procedures
- Models and Commentary
- Development Agreement Model and Commentary
- Density Bonus Model Code Language and Commentary
- Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) Model and Commentary
- 1041 Regulations Model and Commentary
- Cluster Subdivision Model and Commentary
- Overlay Zoning Model and Commentary
- Stream Buffers and Setbacks Model and Commentary
- Stormwater Ordinance Model and Commentary
- Subdivision and Site Design Standards Model and Commentary
- Use-Specific Standards Model and Commentary
- Application Submittal Requirements Model and Commentary
- Post-Disaster Building Moratorium Model and Commentary
- Fluvial Hazard Zone Overlay District
- Landscaping Ordinance Model and Commentary
- Site-Specific Hazard Assessment Model Code Language and Commentary
- Moving Forward
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Community Engagement
- Exploratory Scenario Planning
- Planning for Hazards Project Team
The planning tools and strategies highlighted in this guide represent those commonly used in Colorado communities to address hazard mitigation, as well as some newer strategies. The tools are divided into the following seven categories:
Each tool profile includes the following components:
- Hazards Addressed by the Applicable Tool. Individual tools include icons indicating the applicable hazards. (Keep in mind that tools may be applicable to multiple hazards.)
- How it Works. Description of the tool including relevant background information, how it works, and examples for how it is used to reduce risk to hazards.
- Implementation. Description of how a community would implement the tool. For example, does a tool require adoption of an ordinance, or a special study?
- Where it’s Been Done. This section provides examples of Colorado communities that are using the particular tool, highlighting any lessons learned or other specifics.
- Advantages and Key Talking Points. A list of the primary benefits associated with the particular tool, as well as suggestions for communicating those benefits to stakeholders.
- Challenges. A list of the frequent challenges associated with the particular tool.
- Key Facts. The basic requirements and notable facts related to the tool, including:
- Administrative capacity
- Mapping requirements
- Regulatory requirements
- Maintenance requirements
- Adoption requirements
- Applicable statutory requirements
- Associated costs
- Model Code Language and Commentary. For some tools, model language is included to illustrate actual regulatory language that could help implement the tool, along with commentary. While users of the guide are welcome to use the example language, the model codes should be viewed as a starting point. The language is illustrative only; consult local counsel to tailor language for your jurisdiction.
- Additional Information. For some of the tools profiled, there are publications or sites where the reader can learn more about the tool. Includes examples where communities have used this tool and contact information where the reader can obtain additional information.
Although the focus of many of the concepts and tools highlighted in this chapter relate to planning, the land use planner will not always take the lead role. For example, changes to building codes will be led by the building official, and may require review by the local planner, emergency manager, and local fire authority. Implementing these planning tools and strategies requires thoughtful coordination with other departments and external stakeholders.